It
is bound to happen when one writes
everyday.
Occasionally, without a second
thought,
one may say something said
similarly
before, and sometimes could be
said
again exactly word for word. I have
revisited
some of my earlier works, and
surprisingly
to me, I had forgotten that
which
I had written some time ago. I try
not
to repeat my words let alone rehash
subjects
and themes, but the brain train
has
the tendency to roll over the same
tracks
leading to familiar destinations.
Should
you happen across a writing of
mine
which suggests a redundancy, check
it
out, and find where one word is substi-
tuted
with another. Surely, that word is
intended
to replace the one in the original.
Instead
of “to” I may have substituted “to-
ward.’’
In place of “may,” “might” may now
occupy
the space. “Upon” could replace “on.”
And
so it goes. I may have even gone to the
extreme
and replaced “I” and “me” with “you.”
It
is agreed that I and me are two ways of ad-
dressing
myself. Should you appear, however,
unmistakably,
there can only be one you.
When
I refer to you, you know to whom I
am
speaking. There is really no other way
to
replace you. That is, of course, unless I
resort
to naming names. And I do believe you
wouldn’t
want me to get started with that.
-30-
Chris
Hanch 1-30-2020